Primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma. A case report and literature review.

Primary peritoneal malignant tumors are exceptional. Among them, clear cell carcinoma is extremely rare, being only thirteen cases previously reported in the literature since 1990. We report a case of a 48-year-old Caucasian woman who was treated at the University General Hospital of Alicante. She consulted because of progressive abdominal pain over the last seven months, with the initial diagnosis of renal-ureteral colic. Ultrasound and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a 25 × 15 cm, well-defined cystic lesion with papillary projections, centrally located in the abdomen. The radiology report suggested a primary ovarian tumor versus peritoneal implant as the first option. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy showing a large cystic mass located in the urinary bladder peritoneum, firmly attached to the mesentery. The entire abdominal tumor was completely excised, and total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and infra-colical omentectomy were performed. The final histological study revealed a new case of primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma located in the urinary bladder peritoneum, firmly attached to the mesentery. Grossly, it was well-circumscribed and multicystic with papillary growth involving part of the inner wall. Microscopically, it showed tubulocystic and papillary patterns with highly atypical tumor cells. After an extensive immunohistochemical analysis, the most relevant finding was an ARID1A loss that was corroborated by molecular analysis showing an ARID1A deletion. The patient received systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel protocol (Å ~ 4 cycles). Patient follow-up after the eighth month showed peritoneal implants predominantly in the right diaphragmatic cupule that were histologically confirmed as recurrence. She has just received another six cycles of chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Recognition of primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma in this uncommon location, and exclude metastasis from the ovary, represents a diagnostic challenge.

Has "respiratory coaching" before deep inspiration an impact on the incidence of transient contrast interruption during pulmonary CT angiography?

PURPOSE: To evaluate if respiratory coaching performed prior to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) image acquisition has an impact on the occurrence of transient interruption of contrast (TIC) phenomenon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were referred for CTPA. They were randomised into two groups, with or without respiratory coaching (groups A and B, respectively). Those patients who were deemed not able to be coached were not randomised and were assigned to a third group (C). Two radiologists evaluated the degree of enhancement of the pulmonary arteries and the presence and grade of TIC. The χ(2) test was used to compare differences among groups in occurrence and grade of this phenomenon. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the presence of any grade of TIC among the three groups, with 30 positive cases (32%) in group A, 33 (35%) in group B, and 12 (27%) in group C (P = 0.61). When TIC was graded and divided into significant or not, the different groups also did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Performing respiratory coaching before CTPA had no statistically significant effect on the incidence and severity of TIC in this prospective randomised study. MAIN MESSAGES: • Significant transient interruption of contrast appears in 12% of pulmonary CT angiograms. • Severe transient interruption of contrast leading to nondiagnostic tests appears in 2% of studies. • In our study respiratory coaching has no impact on the incidence of transient interruption of contrast.